Model comparison

GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Sunburst

GPT Image 2.6 ships in the API as two models. Flare is built for speed — drafts in as little as six seconds. Sunburst is built for quality and keeps characters, products and brand details consistent across edits. Here is how to choose.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureFlareSunburst
Tuned forLow latencyDetail and consistency
SpeedAs fast as ~6 s at low qualitySlower, scales with quality
Recommended qualityLow or mediumMedium or high
Edit consistencyGoodBest — characters and products hold across edits
Layout for posters & product shotsImproved over 2.5Strong
API list price (per 1M tokens)Text in $5 · image in $8 · image out $30Same token rates as Flare
Approx. cost per image~$0.005 (1K, low)~$0.05 (1K, high) · ~$0.10 (2K, high)
Credits on gptimage261 per 1K image4 per 1K · 8 per 2K

Prices are OpenAI list rates as reported at launch; check OpenAI's pricing page for current numbers.

When to Use Flare

  • Exploring many ideas or styles quickly
  • Social posts, thumbnails and memes
  • Testing GIF motion before a final render
  • High-volume jobs where cost matters most

When to Use Sunburst

  • Final product photos and campaign visuals
  • Posters and layouts with readable text
  • Multi-step edits of the same character or product
  • 2K output for print and large screens

Our recommendation

Draft with Flare at low quality until the composition is right, then regenerate the winner with Sunburst at medium or high quality. You get Flare's speed for iteration and Sunburst's detail where it counts.

Try both models

Frequently Asked Questions

Not always. Sunburst gives more detail and better consistency across edits, but Flare is much faster and cheaper. For exploring ideas, Flare usually wins; for the final asset, switch to Sunburst.